User talk:183.90.36.66

February 2018
Hello, I'm Byteflush. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Biology and sexual orientation— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. byteflush Talk 12:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Notability and Citation overkill on Singapore Police Force pages
Hello, none of the edits constitute white washing as you have claimed. Do note that I have left the Kovan double murder cases on the Bedok Police Force division's page as it it was a case which generated significant coverage both locally and internationally. The other cases you have cited are individual acts by service members, with no notable relation to the division they were assigned in.

Please do familiarize yourself with several of Wikipedia's guidelines, specifically:

Wikipedia is not a newspaper, specifically item no.2 on the list, which concerns notability of certain events and subjects which are deemed encyclopedic, for the individual cases on each division's page.

Citation overkill, for the list of news reports which backup the statement that police officers can file internal reports against their own members. What's more, many of the articles linked there contain the same information from different media outlets. Several of the newly linked contents you have inserted also do not backup the statement.

I hope this helps, and welcome you to continue editing. Seloloving (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit: Apologies, Wikipedia:Citation overkill is not an official guideline, but an advisory by established editors. But nevertheless, three references is sufficient enough in my opinion to backup the statement that "police officers can whistleblow their colleagues' official misconducts and wrongdoings by filing official police reports themselves to officially open investigation papers against lawless officers of the law." Should you have a fourth, I think it will need to be a sufficiently well publicized case to justify an inclusion. But I prefer to discuss this on the talkpage of the Singapore Police Force to reach a consensus with the input of other editors. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 10:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello, do note that it's not about tabulating a list of every case of an internal report, but of referencing the specific sentence that officers can file them. At four references, it has been adequately sourced. Seloloving (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)