User talk:183.90.36.90

June 2016
Hello, I'm Random86. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jo Se-ho seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 09:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gold mining seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gold mining with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Ben Davis (footballer)
I've removed your content once again from Ben Davis (footballer) - please familiarise yourself with our policies on the biographies of living people and neutral and balanced coverage. Please do not reinsert the extensive coverage concerning Davis's national service, I have edited the coverage to ensure it is compliant with our policies, not to whitewash it completely. If you wish to expand the coverage, you may discuss doing so at Talk:Ben Davis (footballer) before making further edits. Nick (talk) 12:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Your recent editing history at Ben Davis (footballer) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)