User talk:184.15.58.148

Adding possible deletable info to Living dinosaur article
Before re-adding this info without consensus, please bring it up on the talk page for debate. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Why wouldn't the Partridge Creek Monster be a living dinosaur? 184.15.58.148 (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, who the heck are you that you don't understand wikipedia protocol? I've asked nicely and nothing. This is the only article you've ever edited and you still keep adding this trash. Am I wasting my time trying to talk with you? It is not a living dinosaur, it is actually being discussed for deletion or merging. Per the sources it might actually be something Arthur Conan Doyle cooked up to promote his book. But when someone reverts a new addition you do not add it back. You bring it to the talk page to convince others you are correct. Right now you are putting the horse before the cart and insisting it stay. It will likely be deleted by someone else now. We'll see. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, now you're just being stupid. It IS a living dinosaur. It's right there in black and white, so don't give me anything about it not being a dinosaur OR a Sir Arthur Conan Doyle creation.00:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)184.15.58.148 (talk)