User talk:184.151.179.250

August 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jay Shetty have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jay Shetty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jay Shetty, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:02, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Censorship?
Ignoring the fact that Wikipedia isn't a government agency, so it cannot, by definition, practice censorship, what you're trying to do is put negative information into a biographical article without citing a source, or by citing a source that is not reliable. YouTube videos are not reliable sources. Discussion boards are not reliable sources.

If you really want to get information in a Wikipedia article to stick, you need to understand the policy in WP:BLP regarding deletion of unsourced information. Otherwise, you're wasting your time and the time of the editors who delete/revert what you post. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)