User talk:184.163.71.108

September 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abqaiq–Khurais attack have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abqaiq–Khurais attack was changed by 184.163.71.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965918 on 2021-09-14T17:12:32+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disc jockey. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Disc jockey was changed by 184.163.71.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92309 on 2021-09-14T17:16:28+00:00

October 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Côte Saint-Luc—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Water bottle. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Grim23 ★ 14:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Galchenyuk, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Alex Galchenyuk was changed by 184.163.71.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876425 on 2021-10-04T16:44:59+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sigmund Freud's views on religion. — DaxServer (talk to me) 19:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Amy winehuse's death\
Hello, 184.163.71.108. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amy winehuse's death\, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Amy winehuse's death\


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Amy winehuse's death\, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Pierrefonds-Roxboro have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 13:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pierrefonds-Roxboro. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edit appears to saying that everyone in teh borough is Muslim Meters (talk) 19:54, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.