User talk:184.183.156.150

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Château d'Angers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Château d'Angers was changed by 184.183.156.150 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923758 on 2011-09-19T17:18:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Proxy server with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cushing's syndrome has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RandomAct(talk to me) 18:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luxembourg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 15:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at King of the Hill with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —S MALL JIM   22:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Education in the Thirteen Colonies, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Education in the Thirteen Colonies was changed by 184.183.156.150 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956509 on 2013-01-24T21:38:23+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. —S MALL JIM   21:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, I'm NewEnglandYankee. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Masaru Emoto because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 20:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ransom E. Olds has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ransom E. Olds was changed by 184.183.156.150 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951419 on 2016-02-11T17:21:33+00:00.

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Asch conformity experiments— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Canoe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Canoe was changed by 184.183.156.150 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970754 on 2017-11-14T17:38:04+00:00.

December 2018
Hello, I'm Goose121. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chemical weapons in World War I have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. goose121 (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lightning Thief. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ismene—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Miranda v. Arizona. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)