User talk:184.189.217.210

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Alicia Machado. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nika de Hitch (talk) 11:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Zigzig20s. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~ Rob 13 Talk 07:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This claim of "policy evasion" is nonsense ... there were no edits from this address since the previous warning, and I have no idea how to do such "evading" or what it would consist of. But then, neither do I care about this block ... I had no intention of editing over the next week or the foreseeable future. -- 184.189.217.210 (talk) 04:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Since I got no response to that comment, and I'm curious, I'm going to request an unblock. -- 184.189.217.210 (talk) 23:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * By the way, the block that is being evaded is clearly noted in the block log -- Ok, I found an entry that refers to a user called "BatteryIncluded". I read the sockpuppet "investigation". This is the worst sort of illogical nonsense I've ever seen. I am not BatteryIncluded and my style is nothing like that person. The only "evidence" produced is that we both edited the same talk page and both made comments about the same editor. I had always thought that sockpuppet identification at Wikipedia was based on sophisticated technology, like tracking what IP addresses and locations users log in from (I have no idea where BatteryIncluded is, but I'll bet it's nowhere near me; I do know that he's not a native speaker of English, whereas it's all I speak, and my English is excellent, quite unlike his). But now I find out that it's just guesses by people with poor reasoning skills. What a sad education I've received. I will now know never to believe a sockpuppet identification at Wikipedia. And if I wanted to cause people trouble, all I would have to do is look at the block log and emulate blocked users!


 * Also, my previous comment about not caring and so on is not a legitimate basis for not removing the block ... that comment is history that preceded the request and is no longer operative. That is a cheap and lazy reason not to remove the block.


 * This sort of placing a block for bogus reasons and failing to remove it for bogus reasons  discourages new editors and reinforces the worst perceptions of Wikipedia administration. -- 184.189.217.210 (talk) 09:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting NPA block of IP user. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

October 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Tom Petty. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Binksternet (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)