User talk:184.59.199.20

neutrality violation
The first paragraph describing Oath Keepers as anti-government is impossibly not neutral. The first line of the wikipedia definition for the US Constitution is "The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America." How then, would it be anti-government to "defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic"? Every member of Congress, the Senate, the Supreme Court of the United States, and the President of the United States, pledge this oath. How could anyone construe every politician as anti-government? Every state and local government elected official also swears the same Oath. Does this definition then claim every government member is anti-government? Or is it simply blatantly against Wikipedia's stated neutrality position? The two definitions can not be true at the same time. Therefore, I say to anyone, the non-neutral definition of Oath Keepers on Wikipedia has no place on this forum, as it is severely biased. One cannot defend a position which states that all government is anti-government, yet they have all sworn the same Oath. When President Biden is sworn in as President on January 20, 2021, he will be actively joining Oath Keepers. If he does not actively join Oath Keepers on that day, then he will be lying, and therefore guilty of treason.