User talk:184.71.182.54

September 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Guido Titotto. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guido Titotto. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Guido Titotto was changed by 184.71.182.54 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851645 on 2018-09-27T20:54:14+00:00

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Guido Titotto. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Homo, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2600:1:92A3:89E:9D40:2F04:2234:D604 (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Long-term effects of cannabis has been reverted. Your edit here to Long-term effects of cannabis was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jagmeet Singh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to St. Thomas More Collegiate. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:32, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Edmund Ignatius Rice, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 16:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Voyageurs. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 18:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Great Fire of Rome has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Great Fire of Rome was changed by 184.71.182.54 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928365 on 2020-12-11T19:04:32+00:00

April 2021
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Momoland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  22:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NowThis News have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: NowThis News was changed by 184.71.182.54 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911652 on 2022-11-03T21:17:51+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Edmund Ignatius Rice. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dance—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 22:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Orlando Magic have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Orlando Magic was changed by 184.71.182.54 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954613 on 2023-04-04T19:00:46+00:00

May 2024
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Cars 2: The Video Game. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 19:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)