User talk:184.94.1.98

July 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thorgan Hazard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thorgan Hazard was changed by 184.94.1.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956266 on 2018-07-09T13:54:32+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Douglas Costa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Douglas Costa was changed by 184.94.1.98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961778 on 2018-07-09T13:58:38+00:00.

September 2022
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Labour Day into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)