User talk:184.96.242.136

The approach of this article as currently worded appears highly ideological and agenda driven. Terms like "slaughter" aren't value neutral, as an encyclopedia should be. My disputed edits retained all mentions of killings and numerical figures without using charged language. The structure of the article as I originally found it was heavily unbalanced. It gave no historical context or normal encyclopedic facts for example. It jumped straight into (probably disputed) accounts of bloodshed. Clearly the intent is to make an emotional point, not educate readers about a historic event. Also, the majority of sources used don't appear to be academic. And since they aren't in English, few people on English Wikipedia can verify their contents.

"Slaughter" does not belong in any encyclopedia heading. You don't see that on other pages with far greater (and less controversial) violence involved.