User talk:184.96.48.97

October 2018
People like you are the problem with political correct society today. your inaccurate reporting and representation of a man who masquerades as a woman is repulsive. you need to tell the truth. stating that this person was born a man is absolutely true and clearing the ambiguity of the article. you're being disruptive and disingenuous by constantly changing my edits. you need to stop doing that!

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jamie Clayton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 03:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Jamie Clayton. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jamie Clayton, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:19, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shellwood (talk) 03:21, 26 October 2018 (UTC)