User talk:185.152.67.107

I am a WP:AGF anonymous editor who has been (trying) to edit Wikipedia constructively for several months now. However, I am constantly being harassed and discriminated against by multiple administrators who are definitely violating WP:ADMINCOND, if not outright abusing their tools.

This mainly happens when I try to question or challenge a paticular action taken by an admin, such as blocks, protections, etc. I have raised the issue on the talk page of the admins in question at the time that I notice that challengeable action, but they do not respond, which is a violation of policy. I have therefore taken the issues to WP:AN and WP:ANI to no luck. Frequently after I post at one of the noticeboards, my thread gets summarily reverted and I get blocked, often times for a long duration, sometimes even without talk page access, as a “vandal”, “sock”, “troll,” or other harassing terms. I only know what that first term means! I don’t know what the others mean.

Since repeated attempts to deal with this on numerous occasions involving multiple different admins have failed and ultimately resulted in an unjustified un-appealable block, I feel that this needs to go to ArbCom for review. However,


 * 1). The ArbCom page is indefinitely semi-protected


 * 2). My gut tells me that if I made a case request, someone would revert it and unjustly block me again.


 * 3). The case requests page says that “blocked or banned users may not edit this page”. While I am not a blocked or banned user, being repeatedly accused of being one without evidence causes concern that any edits I make to that page may be reverted.

How do I proceed given all of the above circumstances? (Note: I’m delibrately not naming any admin names here as I firmly believe that doing so would result in one or more of them blocking me). 185.152.67.107 (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * A sock (or sockpuppet) is an account or IP that is being used by a blocked editor to circumvent a block, pretend to be multiple people, or other nefarious purposes. A troll is like a vandal, but is more trying to get a reaction while a vandal's main goal is to alter the info or create hoaxes. Your edit at identity evropa looked like it may have violated WP:NPOV, and you clearly saw the note to discuss changes on the talk page first, because you changed this note, but you did nothing on the talk page, so that is why your edit was reverted (although you should have received a bias warning not a vandalism warning)


 * As for the appeal you want to make, you don't seem to be blocked so what is it that you want to appeal? Tornado chaser (talk) 02:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I left a vandalism warning for a couple of reasons: First, that edit had been made many, many times already by many sock accounts and "drive-by" IPs, which is why there was the note specifically saying not to change the wording. Second, the edit summary ("Fixed Typo") was misleading. The change had nothing to do with a typo, it was a substantial and obviously controversial change in meaning. These strongly indicated the edit was not merely POV, but was actively deceptive, in my opinion. Grayfell (talk) 02:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

If you are blocked, then your first and only course of action is to appeal the block (there is no such thing as an "unappealable" block; if your talkpage access has been revoked then you can use WP:UTRS; if your UTRS access has been revoked, you can appeal to ArbCom; if ArbCom decline your appeal you can wait six months to a year (you'll be told in the decline) and can then appeal again). Editing as an IP is block evasion, and is only going to make it less likely that you will be unblocked. Without further information - such as the diffs you are complaining about, the account you claim has been unfairly blocked, or the administrators involved - there is no way for us to assist you, and as such I am closing the above help request. Yunshui 雲 水 12:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)