User talk:185.227.68.38

June 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bertrand Russell— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Arthur. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. In Memoriam A.H.H. What, you egg?. 20:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to South Ossetia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: South Ossetia was changed by 185.227.68.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927546 on 2018-06-08T17:34:10+00:00.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ossetian language. Denisarona (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Audrey Hepburn. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 18:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 General Ization Talk  16:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Peter Andre— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kofta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kofta. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hecseur (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Fufu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 13:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.