User talk:185.232.21.101

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  08:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * "All off-wiki material must be forwarded to the Committee privately via email rather than posted publicly." 185.232.21.101 (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Evidence. ''You take a look at the talk page. "All off-wiki information", not material. What I have provided is a content issue backgrounder. It does not concern editor behaviour in any way, shape or form (the purview of Arbcom). Instead, I provided it to give some useful background information on the matter. There are no privacy issues. Drop the Stick'' &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;   Discuss  09:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.