User talk:185.34.10.186

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Little Train of the Caipira, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:20, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter-gatherer. M.Bitton (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Excutient. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Thomas Cromwell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.    Excutient Talk 11:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religious text. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 22:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Religious text has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Religious text was changed by 185.34.10.186 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953376 on 2020-11-16T21:51:54+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Curzon Ashton F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Curzon Ashton F.C. was changed by 185.34.10.186 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883343 on 2020-11-16T22:50:58+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Xstoe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Eyjafjallajökull have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Xstoe (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to William Wilberforce—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 08:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abolitionism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 10:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Georges Méliès have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Georges Méliès was changed by 185.34.10.186 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877485 on 2021-05-10T13:11:35+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Georges Méliès, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Georges Méliès. Serols (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2022
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Angus Loughran—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  10:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Georges Méliès, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Georges Méliès. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

--Vsmith (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)