User talk:185.45.22.136

March 2020
Your recent editing history at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Denmark shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Note the title of the article: 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Denmark, meaning that first local case refers to origin of first case in Denmark, not first in Europe, Germany or anywhere else. Similarly, the date in the infobox is first detected in Denmark, not first detected in Europe or somewhere else. If you think "first local case" is not clear enough (I certainly think it is: Denmark is in the title of the page and repeated in heading of infobox) you can modify it, e.g. "origin of first Danish case", but I strongly urge you to not blankly reinstating your comment again and avoid violating WP:3RR, which results in a block (as described in the template above). 62.107.211.90 (talk) 15:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!


We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts. We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:


 * WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
 * WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik  talk 09:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Titanic conspiracy theories—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.