User talk:185.58.55.148

August 2023
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

User:Jayron32 It is not a personal attack it is simply the statement of my political vietpoint. Please do read my comment below regarding the person who blocked me. Again it is NOT a personal attack in the same way that asking a judge who is biased to recuse themselves would not be a personal attack on that judge.
 * I think you need to adjust your understanding of how to treat people. Just below, you called someone a "queer BLM China loving person", and if you think that's a "political viewpoint" and not a blatant personal attack, there's nothing I can do for you.  Vaya con dios.  -- Jayron 32 18:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

User:Jayron32 I was expressing my political viewpoint about pronouns and the left leaning partisan hacks on Wikipedia and that is why I was blocked. I simply said that the person who blocked me (akin to a judge) was biased and unsuited to block me because they are so called "queer" and like BLM which clearly means they are against people who don't love that kind of ideology. Ok well this is discrimination based on political views. The person who blocked me is a "queer" "BLM" China loving person so of course they would like to silence my views based on political opinion.
 * You are blocked for making personal attacks, and with that comment you just dug yourself deeper. Nice going. You earned a block extension. Use this talk page to make an unblock request. Continuing with the attacks will result in losing access to this talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


 * So mentioning the attributes that a person exposed on their own talkpage is an attack? I just want to be judged fairly here by someone impartial and neutral, that's all. 185.58.55.148 (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You aren't entitled to express your views here, see WP:FREESPEECH. If your views prevent you from interacting with others in a civil manner without personal attacks, there is no place for you here. This is a global community of all types of races, religions, genders, sexuality, and political views who do our best to get along. There are plenty of conservatives here who do get along with us and understand basic human courtesy. Consider if insulting liberals is how you want to go through life instead of trying to get along with other people who just think differently than you. 331dot (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Request
185.58.55.148 (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 11 August 2023 (UTC)