User talk:185.73.64.254

November 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Stonehenge School, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dust (His Dark Materials), you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Joshua Bates (financier)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheEpTic (talk) 14:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Newcastle upon Tyne, you may be blocked from editing. DBaK (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021
Hello, I'm Ram1055. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Diaethria anna—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~RAM (talk) 11:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pink flowers, you may be blocked from editing. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Third wave. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Referee have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Referee was changed by 185.73.64.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.98593 on 2021-05-14T11:19:26+00:00

June 2021
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Copper in renewable energy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tymon. r Do you have any questions?  12:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Copper in renewable energy. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Copper in renewable energy was changed by 185.73.64.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853231 on 2022-02-07T12:18:21+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Copper in renewable energy, you may be blocked from editing. Tymon. r Do you have any questions?  12:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nanny of the Maroons—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn talk  14:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
The recent edit you made to West Side Story constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize Wikipedia pages. Thank you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greggs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. My Pants Metal (talk) 13:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Zoe Trent Fan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Suffragette bombing and arson campaign have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Zoe Trent Fan 🎤💍 13:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arlo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nick Levine (talk) 13:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suffragette bombing and arson campaign, you may be blocked from editing. ButterCashier (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello. Your recent edit to Aylesbury Grammar School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 11:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)