User talk:185.75.56.168

Onogurs
You done 9 reverts on the article of Onogurs in less than 24 hours, which is double violation of the WP:3RR. It is more than obvious to be an IP sock related to blocked User:PavelStaykov. Stop it, if not the IP will be reported at ANI for an indefinite block.--Crovata (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

- so - this is how Turkish science works? Ban the others from editting?

October 2016
Your recent editing history at Onogurs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 15:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 15:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. &#40;&#40;&#40;The Quixotic Potato&#41;&#41;&#41; (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Already blocked., this is alleged to be The Editor Known As User:PavelStaykov, whom you blocked last year with your CU stamp. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Valenciano (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at User talk:Mriduls.sharma/Archive 1. Valenciano (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017
Hello, I'm Linguist111. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:Ponyo. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Linguist talk&#124; contribs 22:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion, trolling. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.