User talk:185.89.216.230

November 2015
Hello, I'm TyA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2036, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ty(talk) 16:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Carl Sandburg has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Carl Sandburg was changed by 185.89.216.230 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950772 on 2016-01-06T18:57:30+00:00.

February 2016
Hello, I'm Antiqueight. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to History of the camera has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   &#127866;  Antiqueight  chat 20:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Americans for Truth about Homosexuality. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. - MrX 21:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Hello, I'm 172.56.42.176. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Carson Wentz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 172.56.42.176 (talk) 04:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jean Stothert has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jean Stothert was changed by 185.89.216.230 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920115 on 2016-11-17T14:31:10+00:00.

May 2017
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chemical energy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at The X's, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)