User talk:186.151.63.54

May 2020
Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Éowyn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. I noticed that you recently removed content from Éowyn without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Could you please stop attacking the article. The material is reliably cited and has been independently reviewed. If you have a point to make, feel free to explain it here, or on the article's talk page. '' Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Éowyn, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. xRENEGADEx 17:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XRENEGADEx (talk • contribs) 17:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Look, I've no idea why you think trying to delete a reliably-cited part of this article might be a good idea. It isn't: anything you delete will rapidly be reverted, as you have surely noticed by now, and you will receive steadily more serious warnings until you are blocked from editing, very possibly permanently, and that will be the end of your Wikipedia career. Why would you want to do that? The article has been carefully constructed and takes into account what the best scholars and critics have said. That is the proper role of the encyclopedia. Let it alone. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Éowyn. Lava Lamps (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.