User talk:186.195.26.254

Edit-warring
You are edit-warring at Rachel Bilson and violating Wikipedia policy on biographies of living people. We do not publish anonymous, unattributed claims by unnamed, shadowy "sources." Wikipedia is not a gossip site or a tabloid. When you were reverted the first time, you were supposed to open a talk-page discussion as per WP:BRD. If you continue edit-warring, I'll need to ask for admin intervention.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as done at Rachel Bilson. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 23:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Again, you're editing warring to insert a rumor
At least two editors have continued to revert your non-encyclopedic inclusion of a tabloid rumor at Rachel Bilson based on unattributed, unnamed "sources." Tabloid can say anything they want and claim some "source" told them that someone was pregnant, getting divorced, getting engaged, etc., and at lest 50 percent of the time it's not true. Stop believing tabloids as if they were the word of God. We've had to protect the page from you, and an admin once already has blocked you from editing for 72 hours. Next time, the block will be longer. Please stop adding rumors. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for yet again edit warring to insert tabloid-sourced gossip in a BLP, as you did at Rachel Bilson. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Hayden Christensen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Backendgaming (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2014
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hayden Christensen with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 13:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)