User talk:186.212.164.65

January 2021
 Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gideon Greif, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

 Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gideon Greif, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * While I remain somewhat doubtful that the deleted material is not reliably sourced, your further explanation is sufficient for me to strike the above messages and leave the matter to anyone else who wishes to look into it further. Donner60 (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you for understanding what's going on 186.212.164.65 (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.   Steve M (talk) 13:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 186.212.164.65, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

RfC
I've opened a RfC into the section per WP:BRD, thanks for pointing that out. Cheers, Pahunkat (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for gross nationalism and personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 14:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.