User talk:186.227.92.239

Attribution
Hi, I noticed the comment you left on Talk:Bucha massacre. It should be noted that, especially in extreme circumstances, we seek to provide encyclopedic information, while at the same time, stating the source in the body of the text if it is likely to be challenged. Objective authorities don't have access to Bucha yet and it's important to remember that the massacre was only discovered a few days ago, so we provide information from possibly biased sources, and attribute the info to those sources in order to let the reader make the judgement (this is why we have "Zelensky says this" and "Russian Media says that" instead of just typing the info as it's presented). See WP:Attribution for more info.

Chances are the article is not in its best and most objective shape because it is extremely recent and the only sources are either biased or very vague. That doesn't mean it should be removed or changed in its current state. We should wait until we get objective coverage by the ICC or another more trustworthy source before change anything to be more pro-russian or pro-ukranian. Hope this helps! ☢️Plutonical☢️ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  13:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)