User talk:187.102.255.140

November 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Powerpuff Girls. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. dates Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mickey Mouse Works, you may be blocked from editing. dates Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Powerpuff Girls. dates Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Dates
You say "the dates are wrong" where you keep changing them on Looney Tunes pages. Do you have any sources? I asked inline, asking here as well. Are your dates meant to be air dates including reruns? See WP:RS if it helps understand what I mean. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Powerpuff Girls. Still adding fake dates Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at The Powerpuff Girls shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Edit warring falsification of dates Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Powerpuff Girls. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  qedk ( t  愛  c ) 14:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.