User talk:188.23.178.232

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Becky Anderson (journalist) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. — GorillaWarfare talk 04:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)turd

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Roger Vinson. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Summaries like "put that right there, anyone who reverts is a vandalist" are unproductive. In the future, please go to the talk page to work out any disputes such as these. Please try to work collaboratively. In this case, I feel that User:Brian the Editor is in the right on this one.'' — GorillaWarfare talk 05:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Walter Isaacson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SQGibbon (talk) 05:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Broadcasting Board of Governors. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 05:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — GorillaWarfare talk 06:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that in some of your edit comments on Roger Vinson you addressed other editors as vandals. This is an inaccurate term to describe someone you are in a content dispute with. Even if you disagree with their arguments, they do have reasonable arguments to support their position. Please avoid using such inflammatory language in the future. Thanks, Bovlb (talk) 17:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)