User talk:188.25.167.182

April 2019
Hello, I'm Dusti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kuchurgan power station— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dusti*Let's talk!* 19:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Kuchurgan power station revert
Not sure what's the reason for the revert on the Kuchurgan power station except a very vague 'not constructive'. And no, I do not wish to experiment, I do not understand why that comment seemed that something that would fit in a sandbox.

Here's the situation: the only fossil/gas power station (Kuchurgan) in the separatist Transnistrian regime was built during soviet times with a custom electrical grid, now incompatible with EU, and also incompatible with Ukraine. The other two, which you removed, have less than 1% of Kuchurgan's power output (20/30MW vs 2000) and cannot cover Moldova's consumption. Given its needs, Moldova can only import energy from Transnistria, with the upgrades discussed in the article, in 2008, still being renegotiated in 2018 - in the source I linked you.

It is, essentially, another way to keep the regime afloat. Regardless of political affiliations, I believe it is an important thing to note about the power station - it can be used by the Transnistrian regime, given that it is the only station capable of supplying Moldova, and Moldova has the need of power, at characteristics only Transnistria can supply.

It is odd that you think this was a random sandbox edit. It was not gibberish, and I took time to provide links to relevant information. While it could have been assumed to taken a political stance, I tried not to. If anything, how can deleting information be seen as "more constructive"? Regardless, if you think you can rephrase what I said in a more constructive way, I'd be happy to take my time to understand what I did wrong.