User talk:188.30.86.250

July 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anticoagulant. ''Although your IP address is slightly different, you are the same user whose edits have been reverted 5x as unconstructive. Get the message and move on - next time, an admin report.'' Zefr (talk) 16:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


 * To Zefr
 * Please do not use over-emotional terms as in your use of 'vandalise' - my changes were certainly not in any way damaging to the article.
 * I have been making corrections or updates or clarifications to the text.
 * Your posted page of 'Anticoagulant' is need of all three. Your reversions back to your text his highly dogmatic.
 * Please explain what points are so objectionable in my emendments?
 * What you should have done as an editor on seeing emendments, is to consider these and if these are minor or point-of-view, you should aim to incorporate them into changes, or if wholly contrary, then indicate that there is a discrepancy in the post article as to the understanding of such points.
 * In scientific articles, it is better that more than one interpretation is offered if there is a discrepancy in the understanding as this is part of the scientific interpretation of the world - theories & hypotheses remain valid until proven not.
 * Please try to reflect your assumed name of being a 'summer breeze', relax your dogmatism, and be ameliorative to others views.
 * Yours
 * ASC 188.30.86.250 (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)