User talk:188.39.161.34

February 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Sutton Coldfield, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sutton Coldfield. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:23, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sutton Coldfield was changed by 188.39.161.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885955 on 2022-02-04T11:23:44+00:00

November 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Julie Crane have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 15:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Julie Crane. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Sirdog (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference, you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to European Cup (athletics)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bertrand Russell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bertrand Russell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 13:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)