User talk:188.74.37.13

RE Danish ratification of Finland's NATO membership
Hi - the vote in the Folketing today can't be the actual ratification of the accession protocol because the accession protocol doesn't exist yet; it's got to be negotiated between NATO and Finland (and starting those negotiations is presently being blocked by Turkey, but that's a whole different matter). What the vote _does_ do is enable Denmark to immediately ratify the protocol as soon as it's negotiated without any further Folketing votes. That'll be the date in the table, and I would imagine there'll be a source explaining exactly what's happened in a joined-up way once that happens. This is the Folketing's explanation in Danish of what the vote means, which I'm basing my understanding on. FrankSpheres (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Also - while it's not exactly ratification, it's not exactly not ratification, either. It might be worth sticking in a note or something to the article explaining this, and that, while of course Denmark can't ratify an agreement that doesn't exist yet, Danish ratification will be really speedy and less of a hurdle and more of a tiny little step; that might make the situation clearest to readers, which is surely the ultimate goal. If you find a good source, or combination of sources, that explains the state of play (I'm afraid that the tweet isn't great for this), then it could definitely go in as, e.g., a note on that row in the table. FrankSpheres (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)