User talk:189.40.89.235

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Avatar: The Way of Water. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Miaow 19:51, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Most of the reviews are mixed, while they praise the movie mostly because of visuals effects and directing, they criticism how "basic" the story is. So, I will appreciate if you stop making look the movie like every review is "good" because it's not. Best regards. Miaow 19:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

First, sorry for not being civil, you're right about that. But if you think I'm biased, rest assured your bias is clearly showing too. Read more reviews. They are not just praising visual effects. Take a look at the accolades/nominations (best film, production design, sound, cinematography, direction). Rotten 80%+ and mean score 7.00+ is mostly praise by all standards. Look at pages like the Interstellar one. Lower Rotten and it's basically just praise. No hard feelings, but it's quite obvious that you're not a fan of Avatar (to say the least).


 * We have policies, and one of them are the neutral point of view. I'm not talking about other articles, I'm talking about this one. And yes, the reviews are mixed. Most about the production and visuales, etc "good", but when critics talk about the story then "it's not good". So yeah, the reviews are positive to mixed. We as encyclopedia try to do our best to follow the neutral poont of view. The only thing I see here is someone that is a "big fan" of the movie that try to edit the info of their favorite movies's article, but please, stop trying to make it look like everything is good about this movie. Miaow 01:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)