User talk:190.194.153.176

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scope (dutch band) (December 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scope (dutch band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scope_(dutch_band) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blaze_Wolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scope_(dutch_band) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Reference improvements needed on Scope draft
You have added some bare URLs at the end of your draft. Bare URLs are allowed, but it is a lot better if you can turn them into proper citations. The links to digitized scans of newspaper articles must be turned into citations giving the date, title of the article, name of the writer (if available), name of the newspaper, page number, and other bibliographical information that could be used to look up the article in a physical archive or at a different digital archive.

The other problem is that the references are not attached to the statements in the draft that the source supports. The principle of verifiability would be supported by adding proper footnotes.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 01:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I did some additional work on the Delpher citations.
 * Somewhere we should record our belief that Delpher content for newspapers before 1995 is okay to use:
 * "I don't know how authoritative this site is, but it says 'Furthermore, about half of the content made available via Delpher is still subject to copyright restrictions. Due to intensive negotiations with publishers and collective rights organizations, Delpher has, however, obtained permission to make newspapers entirely and freely available up to the year 1995, both in the Netherlands and in the rest of the world.' - https://zenodo.org/record/3608550 That's a very unusual arrangement, but good for them for persuading the copyright holders that making the material available was overall beneficial rather than harmful. Your articles are from 20 years earlier, so it turns out you *can* use them, but it's not as if *everything* on Delpher is free of copyright restrictions."
 * The Billboard FM Action chart you cited is not one of the charts we can use for criterion #2, but it does indicate that the album was placed on rotation at a number of stations, so generally pointing towards #11, though not exactly what #11 says. And using the word "featured" in that sentence is silly promotionalism. The album appeared on the list, it was not in any sense featured.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 22:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scope (Dutch band) (December 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scope (Dutch band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scope_(Dutch_band) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johannes_Maximilian&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scope_(Dutch_band) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scope (Dutch band)
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:190.194.153.176 help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Nyan Cena (talk) 01:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC) congratulations

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scope (Dutch band) has been accepted
 Scope (Dutch band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Scope_(Dutch_band) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! –– Formal Dude  (talk)  23:19, 18 March 2023 (UTC)