User talk:190.85.102.90

April 2020
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dominique Provost-Chalkley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 20:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020
Hello, I'm Hummerrocket. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to MoveOn—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Hummerrocket  (talk)  21:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tarana Burke. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Got a smart ideaTell me about it📩 21:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm ProcrasinatingReader. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tenacious D in The Pick of Destiny was changed by 190.85.102.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920708 on 2020-06-14T15:25:15+00:00

July 2020
Hello, I'm Naypta. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to George R. R. Martin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Naypta ☺ &#124; ✉ talk page &#124; 22:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George R. R. Martin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   Thanoscar21talk, contribs 22:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at George R. R. Martin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Naypta ☺ &#124; ✉ talk page &#124; 22:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:190.85.102.90.   JW 1961   Talk  22:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)