User talk:190fordhouse

Your edits
Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. —  Σ  xplicit 01:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Randy Jackson (musician), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Newportm (talk) 01:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to 1971. 2help (message me) 05:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. NrDg 18:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Can't Hang


The article Can't Hang has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NSONGS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes I hear you... 01:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dabrat196153.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dabrat196153.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 04:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dabrat016918.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dabrat016918.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 05:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fastilysock (talk • contribs)

Your Unnecessary Changes
I suggest you STOP making UNNECESSARY edits to the recording dates of songs or albums that other people TOOK THE TIME to RESEARCH and type into the infoboxes! Next time you make INNACCURATE changes to a recording/release date that has an ACTUAL SOURCE next to it OR was actually RESEARCHED to be added, I will report it as VANDALISM! An example is the changes you made to Destiny's Child's first single No, No, No Part 1. The group DIDN'T BEGIN recording their FIRST album until the SUMMER of 1997, NOT 1996! Please take that into consideration as it confuses people who do read background information on a single or album, INCLUDING the recording dates. Carmaker1 (talk) 22:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Keri Hilson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  01:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Unhelpful Edits
Please refrain from making edits related to dates when you don't provide proof on doing so. It can be considered unwarranted vandalism. Numerous users are complaining about your edits and it would help if you communicate with them to understand each others points. If you continue to do so and do not give reasons or provide sufficient proof, I will block you immediately and you may not be able to register again.

January 2010 - Unhelpful Edits
Please explain how your edits to the Wayans Family article improve it. All you have done is to make the obvious more obvious. Saga City (talk) 08:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of Hannah Montana main characters. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 06:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Please cease adding arbitrary dates to album and single recording and release dates
Some of the dates you have added are erroneous. If you have a reference that purports to support any of these dates, please present this reference here at this page in this thread and I will help you to understand whether it is a WP:Reliable source or not, and if so, how to cite your reference when you make changes in the future.

Be advised, especially considering that this page includes at least two other requests to stop posting unsupported and erroneous dates, any further unreferenced and undiscussed edits of this sort will be considered vandalism. I look forward to your response. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 07:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

You will be reported
Many of us are tired of trying communicate to you our issues with your editing and not being provided with a proper FEEDBACK response. We are just going to REPORT you instead and see to it that you can't make any erroneous changes anymore. You continue to undo correct information with a replacement of inconsistencies. We warned you not to make such changes, but you in turn ignore that and continue on your merry way to confuse readers by vandalizing infoboxes. You are sockpuppeting through other profiles such as: User: SonnywithaChancefan, User: Statmo1921, User: 67.85.172.6 to do your vandalism. An administrator will likely tell you that you are suspended and I will continue to monitor edits on your other profiles to ensure that they are factual.Carmaker1 (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Please more careful in your edits like this or this. Ccrazymann (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Take a Bow (Madonna song) and True Jackson, VP. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thanks. Ccrazymann (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Responda por favor.
¿Usted habla inglés? Hemos estado preguntando si usted satisface proporciona a las referencias para la información que usted está añadiendo. Si usted no sabe hacer esto, podemos ayudarle a aprender. Responda por favor. Gracias, Abrazame (talk) 01:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Eu estou indo tentar esta um mais vez, no português. Se você tem fontes para os pontos que de dados você está adicionando aos artigos, deixe-nos por favor saber o que aquelas fontes são.  Nós gostaríamos de ajudá-lo a ser e permanecer um Wikipedian produtivo, mas as mensagens nesta página indicam que você está a ponto de ser proibida - impedido da edição - se você não responde, e todo o seu edita estará revertido automaticamente.  Obrigado, Abrazame (talk) 07:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

US date formats
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. --McGeddon (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/190fordhouse for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Your Edits Are Being Monitored
You need to remember that if you don't follow guidelines, you will certainly be blocked in an effort to preserve accurate information in the Wikipedia articles from your vandalism.

Warning
This is your final warning for edits like this. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 04:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been. (blocked by –MuZemike 08:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

As confirmed by CheckUser. See Sockpuppet investigations/190fordhouse. –MuZemike 08:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Because of your persistent block evasion, your block is now indefinite. –MuZemike 17:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/204.2.37.158 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shadowjams (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/208.54.83.50 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shadowjams (talk) 05:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/98.198.174.81 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shadowjams (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)