User talk:192.0.235.66

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Hong Kong protests
Hi, do you have any direct or indirect conflicts of interest regarding the Hong Kong protests as this is the only topic in your edit history? Atlantic306 (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I have no financial or pecuniary interest if that is what you are thinking. I was originally posting on other platforms (ie reddit) but ppl there were beyond reasons. Take a look over there and compare that to what is here and you see what I mean. The situation has descended into outright racism against ethnic Chinese, which is the primary motivating factor for my reactions.


 * at one pt i was actually naive enuf to believe these ppl actually cared about freedom or at least genuinely believed it. but their actions spoke louder than words. the so called freedom is just an excuse to justify violence and achieving their agenda by all means necessary. anyone who doesn't agree with their logic is open season for violence and hate.


 * it gets even worse. look what is happening in the USA. everything these rioters do is glorified. they are billed as saints who bring salvation to humanity. it has become commonly accepted that as long as one is promoting a "virtuous cause" against "the enemy" then no counterargument is acceptable or even permissible. anyone who disagree must be a paid troll or guilty of promoting propaganda. and given vast majority of the internet traffic is controlled under US companies, when US entities (wikipedia included) find you "guilty of wrong think", there may not be any recourse. now you are just left with an echo chamber. if an opinion appears in the USA (or Reuters), then it is cited here. but if it doesn't, then its fringe and easily dismissed. 192.0.235.66 (talk) 09:38, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * POV pusher confirmed. 223.136.62.214 (talk) 06:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * i m pushing POV no more than any other editors of the same article. i have pointed out false and misleading claims made by others on a number of occasions, because those other POV pushers are not only pushing POV, but pushing fake facts. 192.0.235.66 (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * While you in Taiwan may have more of a personal stock in what happens in China, the IP from Canada - while he/she is forming an opinion based on no first-hand knowledge and has made a judgement based on news reports and their personal values - the IP has a right to a POV and is not "pushing" it as far as it goes. Calling the BBC as unreliable as the communist/dictatorship-controlled Chinese press is, of course, completely unfounded.50.111.1.254 (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)