User talk:192.203.137.196

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (192.203.137.196) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Montgomery, Illinois
Currently, that text is sourced. You want it removed because you don't agree with the source. Therefore, either find a source that backs up your claims or take it to the talk page to discuss its removal. I don't care one way or the other, but if you keep removing it, you're going to find yourself blocked from editing because you're being disruptive. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Final warning. Discuss it first and stop removing. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

How is this information from a town perspective relative. Police departments receive complaints, all the time, so do we need to publish every single one on the towns history now. This is the village history not the history of the police department. One man claiming a racist remark was made to him, and uses a video from the officers dash-cam that does NOT contain a racist remark. Is not relative to the history of the village. The reason it should be removed because it is not relevant, the complainant only added it because they had a personal grudge. Are we going to post every complaint, that gets published to the newspaper. its unnecessary, and bias.
 * Wow, you actually made an argument (and a decent one at that). Amazing... except, you did it on the wrong talk page. Try here: Talk:Montgomery, Illinois. Like I said already, I really don't care. Your argument is strong, but up until now, you have been going about making changes the entirely wrong way. You can't keep removing sections (especially sourced) of an article simply because you don't like them with edit summaries of "is not truthful information, is not based on facts". If your first edit had your last edit summary of "information is not relevant to history of the village", then it may very well have not been reverted and we wouldn't be here. So, try going to the talk page, start a new section (with a header) and put your argument there. Also, don't forget to sign your posts with a ( ~ ). Thanks! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:58, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Guessitsavis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Christopher Vaughn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 22:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)