User talk:192.226.62.169

July 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of fictional ducks, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Calton | Talk 05:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brampton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

====

reply:

> Please do not add or change content [...] without citing a reliable source.

I did so.

I linked it to the source from StatsCan's 2016 census data that came out yesterday. Anyway odds are I'm pretty bad at this editing stuff, so far. But I'm trying. I've fixed the link (I think) and reverted back to my initial changes (including citation).

If the citation is still shoddy, can you please fix the problem, rather than just reverting? I understand why you did it the first time, and I've tried to correct my mistake. However I've got very little """coding""" experience (I don't even know if this is CSS or like...DOS?). So please be gentle. I'm just trying to update things that I think are interesting.

Cheerio
 * Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, demographic data is one of the most frequently vandalized areas on Wikipedia, and when you did not change the "access date" on the source, I figured it was just the random changing of numbers.  Are you able to include the link you used to update your data?  If you add it here I can add it to the article. Thanks.  Magnolia677 (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I kinda thought I already did include it in the article. I mean...it seems to be references #22 and #23...somehow.  Link: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=3521010&Geo2=CD&Code2=3521&Data=Count&SearchText=brampton&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&TABID=1

June 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Wimbledon gentlemen's singles champions. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 15:20, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Palmer Report, you may be blocked from editing. Lepricavark (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Palmer Report. —C.Fred (talk) 19:21, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Saw your comment on Reddit
It's not as funny as you think it is. Get a job. -- Puzzledvegetable Is it teatime already?  21:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * you'd need to be a lot more specific than that. Nonetheless, it's never my intention to be cruel, just walk the fine line between humour and offense.  The fella who's been managing sco.wiki was certainly doing so out of an innocent place of admiration, and I'm not one of the ones who wants to tear his work to the ground.  But I will concede that there's a LOT of work to be done, to undo some of his silliness.