User talk:192.65.235.162

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Bubble Guppies episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Bubble Guppies episodes was changed by 192.65.235.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951442 on 2016-02-14T19:30:14+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie Brown. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Charlie Brown was changed by 192.65.235.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893557 on 2016-02-16T02:00:27+00:00.

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Boy Named Charlie Brown, you may be blocked from editing. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to What a Nightmare, Charlie Brown!. ERK talk 04:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aardman Animations, you may be blocked from editing. Strawberryfields77 (talk) 22:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

August 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cartoon physics. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  11:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Vague, opinion

December 2018
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Sonny Bono. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Karen Chau. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. '' Specifically, you used a conversational format and had an exclamation point, which looked like talking. '' Hummerrocket  (talk)  21:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Jew's harp, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.