User talk:192.76.8.69

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address,, removed content from the page Wilfrid Laurier University without giving an explanation. Please always provide an informative edit summary when removing content from pages. If is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Here are some other hints and tips:
 * I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but  [ creating an account]  is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
 * When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes . This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 06:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pashtuns without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Avon Products, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to David Farrier. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.- gadfium 04:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rarefaction (ecology), you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 15:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Derby Grammar School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 22:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Agent00x. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Anastasia (musical), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Agent00x (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lady Margaret Beaufort, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 12:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Oxford Scientist (June 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Oxford Scientist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Oxford_Scientist Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asilvering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Oxford_Scientist reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)