User talk:192.76.8.84

March 2018
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Queen Elizabeth's School, Barnet— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High Pay Centre, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raima Sen, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Solipsism 101. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Helen Glover (rower) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Solipsism 101 (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm ToastGuard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Toast  (talk)  13:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frank Dellaert, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm MaterialWorks. I noticed that in this edit to The Queen's College Boat Club, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Material Works (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Some history you might be interested in
74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I got curious
Obviously, as you said, we don't need an explicit policy that you can't misrepresent sources, but I did get curious if there is one. All three core content policies have language that alludes to that idea, but none say it outright. WP:HOAX sorta says it but also not quite. Finally did find it—WP:DISRUPTSIGNS #2. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 19:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Tamzin I think this would fall under WP:V - — in this case the sources provided do not "directly support the material" because the edit is misrepresenting what the sources said.
 * It's an essay rather than a policy, but WP:CHERRYPICKING is the page that immediately sprung to mind for me when I read the block rationale on your talk page. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)