User talk:192.76.8.95

January 2019
Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vitruvian Man have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Challenger Deep has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Challenger Deep was changed by 192.76.8.95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893798 on 2019-12-09T09:35:58+00:00

December 2021
Hello, I'm Autarch. I noticed that you recently removed content from David J. Simms without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Autarch (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nirmala Sitharaman seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 13:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello 192.76.8.95! Your additions to Right to education have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jason Isaacs filmography without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CodeTalker (talk) 01:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

 * @Tamzin Thanks. I really wasn't expecting Malnadach to end up blocked as an LTA. I don't understand what would motivate someone to make 10 million edits fixing broken/obsolete HTML while simultaneously creating a massive number of accounts to harass themselves, it's mind-boggling that someone would put that much effort into running a "good hand" account. LTAs are weird. 192.76.8.95 (talk) 17:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * There are a surprising number of LTAs associated with mass-editing, though usually for reasons different than Malnadach. Still putting substantial effort into good hands is a thing Wonderfool/Robdurbar or Poetlister come immediately to mind. An analogy to Archtransit has already been made, which of course leads us to Pastor Theo and the even more baffling case of 172/Cognition still don't know what to think about that last one. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)