User talk:192.80.60.12

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vacco v. Quill has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vacco v. Quill was changed by 192.80.60.12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928685 on 2015-11-30T19:53:06+00:00.

Hello, I'm Ubiquity. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Vacco v. Quill without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Invasive species in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faisal Subzwari, you may be blocked from editing. ubiquity (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, I'm NYBrook098. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of the Thames have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NYBrook098 (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Thames with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --allthefoxes (Talk) 21:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Platanus occidentalis, you may be blocked from editing. Dcirovic (talk) 17:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to New media has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: New media was changed by 192.80.60.12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871706 on 2016-03-03T20:39:21+00:00.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=708130760 your edit] to New media may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * In lan Kay and his co-workers at Xerox PARC began to give the computability of a personal computer

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New media. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Dcirovic (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Hello, I'm In veritas. Your recent edit to the page Chris Kyle appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. In veritas (talk) 18:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of Louisiana with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kinetic37 (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Flag of Louisiana with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Kinetic37 (talk) 15:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Flag of Louisiana. Kinetic37 (talk) 15:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 15:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum was changed by 192.80.60.12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951209 on 2016-09-01T15:28:27+00:00.

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Salmon Ford has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Salmon Ford was changed by 192.80.60.12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915273 on 2017-03-02T17:51:07+00:00.

March 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Anson Jones— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karl Marx has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karl Marx was changed by 192.80.60.12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967414 on 2018-04-02T13:40:52+00:00.