User talk:192.83.228.243

January 2017
Hello, I'm Garchy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Deflategate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Garchy (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Algerian War has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Algerian War was changed by 192.83.228.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929152 on 2017-02-01T16:19:45+00:00.

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cavendish experiment has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cavendish experiment was changed by 192.83.228.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928655 on 2017-11-17T13:45:06+00:00.

January 2018
Hello, I'm Zocke1r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fifth Avenue— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zocke1r (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Quenhitran. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Cayman Prep and High School seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 15:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Deerfield Academy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 16:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deerfield Academy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deerfield Academy, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Deerfield Academy. Serols (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello 192.83.228.243. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:192.83.228.243. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 02:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019
Hello, I'm Bellezzasolo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  21:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Rochester, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The same applies to your edits to various other articles. David Biddulph (talk) 04:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm David Biddulph. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Order of the British Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. See MOS:DATESNO. David Biddulph (talk) 04:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm David Biddulph. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lord-lieutenant have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Again MOS:DATESNO David Biddulph (talk) 04:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please read the Manual of Style, and particularly MOS:DATESNO, & go back and correct the pages which you have edited. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Alai Darwaza, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  00:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zambia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Squeakachu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Deerfield Academy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Squeakachu (talk) 03:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

2nd block for vandalism
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)