User talk:192.94.31.2

Gobshite proposed for deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, Gobshite, has been proposed for deletion. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Whitehead has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thomas Whitehead was changed by 192.94.31.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952024 on 2014-04-24T12:24:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=669634161 your edit] to List of CAx companies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * |NAPA
 * |Pro/ENGINEER now Creo

March 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bert Cook (rugby) has been reverted. Your edit here to Bert Cook (rugby) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://pastcougars.moonfruit.com/the-rock-n-roll-50s/4516792846, https://web.archive.org/web/20090527010230/http://pastcougars.moonfruit.com:80/the-50s-part-2/4516792867) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2018
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Yorkshire Rugby Football Union have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Yorkshire Rugby Football Union was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://en-gb.facebook.com/withernsearufc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2018
Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Michael Morgan (rugby league, born 1991)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Onosai Tololima-Auva'a. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flooded  with them hundreds 13:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Oct 21
Please read wp:brd. if you have been reverted it is down to you to make a case. I also feel wp:editwar and WP:NOTDUMB might be worth your time.Slatersteven (talk) 13:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

OK lets make it "official".

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk) Ok, I will present my point. I have made my statement clear on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cambial_Yellowing#Turning_Point_UK_-_Unnecessary_edits who started this edit war. An article which talks about an organisation should never contain opinionated statements from media outlets. If that's the case, I should be allowed to post an opinionated statement from a right-leaning journalist who thinks this organisation encourages debate? Do you want me to add that in?
 * You need to make your case on the articles talk page, as not everyone reads other users talk pages.Slatersteven (talk) 13:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you edited under another IP?Slatersteven (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Cambial foliage❧ 14:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You did not read wp:editwar did you? You need to undo your latest revert or you may well get a block, edit warring whistle under an ANI or edit war report is really very foolish.Slatersteven (talk) 15:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Seriously, are you trying to get a block, you need to stop reverting. Right now you are heading for one.Slatersteven (talk) 15:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 14:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Turning Point UK) for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC) You are only blocked from editing the article itself, you may contribute to the article talk page and make a case for what you wish to see. 331dot (talk) 15:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)