User talk:193.106.124.191

February 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bare-metal server, you may be blocked from editing.  SITH   (talk)   16:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Removing that ref, and then edit-warring to do it again is not only a problem for edit-warring, but because starting to remove other refs when a ref you added has been removed by others looks far too much like you're just doing it out of spite.
 * Use Talk:Bare-metal server to discuss this, or else I predict it ending badly. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Doing the same thing here on Hard money loan is really not the way to go! Andy Dingley (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bare-metal server. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 193.106.124.191. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Let's focus on the issue. A notable page has been deleted although it was live on Wikipedia for more than 4 years. I don't have any connection with the company for more than 2 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.106.124.191 (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Editors with a conflict of interest are sometimes unaware of whether or how much it has influenced their editing. The repetitive focus on this topic seems to prove a conflict of interest, caused by a connection that you personally consider to be no longer relevant. I disagree, and I recommend disengaging from the topic. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * We will proceed as you recommend, but I believe we are missing the point. The company was notable 4 years ago and still is today because of the product they developed and improved since 2013. At least turn the page (ComputerSupport.com) to draft maybe someone has more information about the topic.