User talk:193.109.196.225

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Event-related potential has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Event-related potential was changed by 193.109.196.225 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886755 on 2017-04-08T21:39:39+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Event-related potential, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Penskins (talk) 21:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Jiten Dhandha •  talk  •  contributions  • 21:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding edit on Event-related potential
Hey! I saw that there may have been a misunderstanding between us when editing the page Event-related potential. Having reviewed the edits again, I think you may have acted in good-faith and tried to salvage lost information. Each time you edit the page, some of the templates were broken or some part of the page was lost which led me to thinking that this was a clear-cut case of vandalism. If not, please do reply here just to let me know if I may have made an error in stepping in. If it was indeed an error on my part, accept my humblest apologies. Also, next time you make an edit on Wikipedia, make sure to preview the edit to see what the end product is so that a bad edit isnt pushed to the web! Jiten Dhandha •  talk  •  contributions  • 22:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)