User talk:193.190.11.97

Nonsense of Hoofdpagina
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hoofdpagina, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hoofdpagina provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hoofdpagina, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PDMS
A tag has been placed on PDMS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Teapot  george Talk  12:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Document server


The article Document server has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Merely a dictionary definition

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keφr (talk) 04:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Hoofdpagina listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hoofdpagina. Since you had some involvement with the Hoofdpagina redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Intelligent Small World Autonomous Robots for Micro-manipulation


The article Intelligent Small World Autonomous Robots for Micro-manipulation has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "poorly-referenced article about a non-notable research project, fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Pathological science has been nominated for merging
Category:Pathological science has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. &#32;- car chasm (talk) 03:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)