User talk:193.194.106.76

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baroque Amateur Choir B.A.CH. (November 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baroque Amateur Choir B.A.CH. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Baroque_Amateur_Choir_B.A.CH. Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asilvering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Baroque_Amateur_Choir_B.A.CH. reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! Can you explain what is wrong with the references about the choir specifically? Isn't it enough to have links from different media sources covering about it? 193.194.106.76 (talk) 20:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi IP, just an fyi, you need to ping us when you reply to these AfC template messages, or we'll probably miss them. I only noticed this one because it came up on my watchlist. See Template:Ping for ways to do this. As for the sources, have a look at the links in the grey box above. You can use sources that don't fulfil all of these criteria, but you do need at least one very good one (preferably more) that meets all four criteria. If you read those links and you're still confused, feel free to ask me any clarifying questions you might have. -- asilvering (talk) 21:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)