User talk:193.213.83.195

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Java applet, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Java applet was changed by 193.213.83.195 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871997 on 2011-11-23T16:17:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
I don't know if all the edits under this IP are yours, but thanks for at Volumetric display :) Cheers, Waldir talk 12:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. Happy to help. :)

January 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Windows Live Mail, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * It should be quite obvious why I removed that line (it was redundant and in the wrong place), do you really want me to document every tiny change I make? This will just create information overload IMO. Also, there's no need to be so patronising. Thank you.
 * Hello. Yes, please supply an edit summary for every removal. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)